Criticism of Falsifiability

0,00 lei

Autor(i): Nicolae Sfetcu
Anul: 2019
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30572.82568

(Downloads - 0)

Descriere

Thomas Kuhn criticized falsifiability because it characterized „the entire scientific enterprise in terms that apply only to its occasional revolutionary parts,” and it cannot be generalized. In Kuhn’s view, a delimitation criterion must refer to the functioning of normal science. Kuhn objects to Popper’s entire theory and excludes any possibility of rational reconstruction of the development of science. Imre Lakatos said that if a theory is scientific or non-scientific, it can be determined independently of the facts. He proposed a modification of Popper’s criterion, which he called „sophisticated (methodological) falsification”.

Informații suplimentare

Autor(i)

Anul

DOI

10.13140/RG.2.2.30572.82568

Recenzii

Nu există recenzii până acum.

Fii primul care adaugi o recenzie la „Criticism of Falsifiability”

Adresa ta de email nu va fi publicată. Câmpurile obligatorii sunt marcate cu *